• Home
  • About Rimag
  • Contact Us
  • Register
  • Log in
  • Order
Advanced
  • Home
  •  
  • Current Issue

    43
    Issue 43   Vol 11 Summer 2023
    Submit Your Paper List of Reviewers

    Published Issues

    • Vol. 11
      • ✓ Issue 43 - Summer 2023
      • ✓ Issue 42 - Spring 2023
      • ✓ Issue 41 - Winter 2023
    • Vol. 10
      • ✓ Issue 40 - Autumn 2022
      • ✓ Issue 39 - Summer 2022
      • ✓ Issue 38 - Spring 2022
      • ✓ Issue 37 - Winter 2022
    • Vol. 9
      • ✓ Issue 36 - Autumn 2021
      • ✓ Issue 35 - Summer 2021
      • ✓ Issue 34 - Spring 2021
      • ✓ Issue 33 - Winter 2021
      • ✓ SPECIAL ISSUE
    • Vol. 8
      • ✓ Issue 32 - Autumn 2020
      • ✓ Issue 31 - Summer 2020
      • ✓ Issue 30 - Spring 2020
      • ✓ Issue 29 - Winter 2020
    • Vol. 7
      • ✓ Issue 28 - Autumn 2019
      • ✓ Issue 27 - Summer 2019
      • ✓ Issue 26 - Spring 2019
      • ✓ Issue 25 - Winter 2019
    • Vol. 6
      • ✓ Issue 24 - Autumn 2018
      • ✓ Issue 23 - Summer 2018
      • ✓ Issue 22 - Spring 2018
      • ✓ Issue 21 - Winter 2018
    • Vol. 5
      • ✓ Issue 20 - Autumn 2017
      • ✓ Issue 19 - Summer 2017
      • ✓ Issue 18 - Spring 2017
      • ✓ Issue 17 - Winter 2017
    • Vol. 4
      • ✓ Issue 16 - Autumn 2016
      • ✓ Issue 15 - Summer 2016
      • ✓ Issue 14 - Spring 2016
      • ✓ Issue 13 - Winter 2016
    • Vol. 3
      • ✓ Issue 12 - Autumn 2015
      • ✓ Issue 11 - Summer 2015
      • ✓ Issue 10 - Spring 2015
      • ✓ Issue 9 - Winter 2015
    • Vol. 2
      • ✓ Issue 8 - Autumn 2014
      • ✓ Issue 7 - Summer 2014
      • ✓ Issue 6 - Spring 2014
      • ✓ Issue 5 - Winter 2014
    • Vol. 1
      • ✓ Issue 4 - Autumn 2013
      • ✓ Issue 3 - Summer 2013
      • ✓ Issue 2 - Spring 2013
      • ✓ Issue 1 - Winter 2013

    Menu

    • •  Editorial Board
    • •  Journal Policy
    • •  About Journal
    • •  Special Issues
    • •  Author's Guide
    • •  Article Processing Charges (APC)
    • •  Evaluation Process
    • Contact Journal

    Browse

    • •  Current Issue
    • •  By Issue
    • • Author Index
    • •  By Subject
    • •  By Author
    OpenAccess
    • List of Articles  

      • Open Access Article
        • Abstract Page
        • Full-Text

        1 - Long-Term Software Fault Prediction Model with Linear Regression and Data Transformation
        Momotaz  Begum Jahid Hasan Rony Md. Rashedul Islam Jia Uddin
        10.61186/jist.36585.11.43.222
        20.1001.1.23221437.2023.11.43.6.5
        The validation performance is obligatory to ensure the software reliability by determining the characteristics of an implemented software system. To ensure the reliability of software, not only detecting and solving occurred faults but also predicting the future fault i More
        The validation performance is obligatory to ensure the software reliability by determining the characteristics of an implemented software system. To ensure the reliability of software, not only detecting and solving occurred faults but also predicting the future fault is required. It is performed before any actual testing phase initiates. As a result, various works on software fault prediction have been done. In this paper presents, we present a software fault prediction model where different data transformation methods are applied with Poisson fault count data. For data pre-processing from Poisson data to Gaussian data, Box-Cox power transformation (Box-Cox_T), Yeo-Johnson power transformation (Yeo-Johnson_T), and Anscombe transformation (Anscombe_T) are used here. And then, to predict long-term software fault prediction, linear regression is applied. Linear regression shows the linear relationship between the dependent and independent variable correspondingly relative error and testing days. For synthesis analysis, three real software fault count datasets are used, where we compare the proposed approach with Naïve gauss, exponential smoothing time series forecasting model, and conventional method software reliability growth models (SRGMs) in terms of data transformation (With_T) and non-data transformation (Non_T). Our datasets contain days and cumulative software faults represented in (62, 133), (181, 225), and (114, 189) formats, respectively. Box-Cox power transformation with linear regression (L_Box-Cox_T) method, has outperformed all other methods with regard to average relative error from the short to long term. Manuscript profile
  • Home Page
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Regional Science and Technology Information Center
  • Contact Us

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2017-2023

Home| Login| About Rimag| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]
  • Ricest
  • Login
  • email